Jan 10, 2010

Departures and change - The Empire strikes back!

The Empire strikes back! This is an often heard statement. It signifies that when small chieftains rebel and disobey the dictates of the empire, the larger ruling body, sooner or later, strikes back. This is an act of revenge, of punishment and of re-establishing who has the power.


What significance is the statement to our present times? We live in an era of change, continuous change. We have recognized that change does not come easily and often with much heartburn. While we speak about the need for change and how fighting change is not a wise position to take, it is equally true that we are not able to support change, or participate in it in an intelligent manner.


Why is this so? Welcoming change on the one hand, however shakily, why do we find it difficult to accept the new? 


When we build a castle on the beach, a sand castle, very soon the wind and the waves reduce it, make it one with the background. 


Practices which are unsustainable by reason are sustained by people, almost despite all reason and opposition. To bring about change in these practices has been often the work of centuries. Slavery was not abolished in a day. Untouchability to this day can be seen in India. Legislative action has not been able to change much. Attitudes change with difficulty, if at all.


One can understand that human beings who have been practicing a way of living, get accustomed to it. The pain of change is understandable. It is one thing to say "Sorry, I find it difficult to change. I see that this is the sensible direction. But, please pardon me, in my lifetime I am unable to change."


However it is quite another thing to say, "Why do you say slavery is wrong, or untouchability?" This is almost like saying "There is nothing wrong. People have been practicing this for centuries. Why are you coming along now and wanting to make a change?"


The first position does not obstruct movement and change. The second one actively engages in sustaining the status quo. The second one raises philosophical questions. Is it really wrong to do what our forefathers have been doing? What makes us think that the experience of centuries is to be ignored? And often in an unstated undertones, "What about my privileges - won't  change makes my life more difficult? Nobody wants to lose privileges - neither do I."


The Empire strikes back in interesting ways. But the process followed is the same as with civilizational ruins. A big building or a temple first has to be abandoned. People stopped coming to it because a River changes course, there is a famine, a conquest or a pestilence. Under these circumstances people leave and the building, the artifacts of their living, are left empty. Therefore this use is the first criteria.


Once disuse has been brought about, geographical and natural processes do the rest. The building settles, and dust settles. Dust and moisture, if available to the rest -- it decays either by  sand or by sand and plant life.


It is also a paradox that when we want to improve something, we find that the improved practice, actually strengthens the older practice. It is almost a way of saying "Thank you, but no thank you". Therefore it seems that when change takes place it is not due to the support of interventions all human beings, but despite all the opposition that the idea has received. It is extremely difficult to support a new idea. All actions of support, use, modification bring about greater and greater resistance.


Therefore a new idea seems to grow, much like the sprouting of the seed -- it bursts to plant when it is time has come.

Tolerance is considered a virtue

Tolerance is considered a virtue. But is there such a thing as tolerating too much? One needs to distinguish between tolerance of human beings and their traits and tolerance of concerted collective action.

Mannerisms of human beings must be tolerated, these are individual. Policies of the government, actions of individuals in the public domain must be questioned and searched for hidden motives. The history of mankind, is an enormous list of follies. It shows us that with the best of intentions people and Governments can make big mistakes. The tragedy is that these mistakes of policy happen despite alarm calls from people who speak, protest and dissent.

India has been a very tolerant land. Our history shows we can that we have accepted the unfair taxes and draconian laws of rulers somewhat easily. This does not mean that people did not find ways of protesting.

There have been many examples of nonviolent protests.

The Chipko movement took its inspiration from a much earlier protest by ordinary people against the might of a king - hugging trees to prevent them from being cut down, even if it meant losing one's life. Fasting, refusing to eat, as a way of drawing attention to disagreement is ancient, but also extremely common. Very small children express their protest in this manner. Children protest using three main devices - they sulk, fast and refuse to move,

Concerted protest, based on principles is rare. The salt March, the act of walking many miles to pick up a handful of salt, was a powerful symbolic act. It shook the foundations of the British Empire. It showed how nonviolent action could stand up and be counted.

For the youth of this land, there is a crisis brewing. Information knocks at every door and we all know about the shortcomings of our nation. The government makes policies that harm the environment, that harm people, that favor large corporations, that takes this nation down a path of no return. Nuclear energy, excessive deforestation, parceling land off to private corporations are examples of such action. What can a young person to do when witnessing all this?

Bearing witness is a sacred act, which implies looking with clear eyes and not glassine over the details - of environmental degradation, of laws beige broken, of injustice, of corruption and vested inerests. Baba Amte once made a profound statement when speaking to young students. "Look at the world through tear washed eyes and not tear dimmed eyes".

For a young person, one who has still not been co-opted into the circle of corruption and vested interests, there is a vital opportunity. India has a large number of young people. With the information available today each one must know that the decision-makers of today are making decisions that will have significant impact on your future. Many of the definitions are irreversible in their impact. The mountains being strip mined cannot be reconstructed. Nuclear waste buried underground cannot be suddenly neutralized. Land which has been parceled off and chemically poisoned cannot be reclaimed easily. Genetically modified crops once unleashed will bring to an end an ancient cycle of natural farming. Your future and that of your children is on the block. Fortunately you have information which no other generation before you have had.

Each of us is a small human being, but like many have shown it is the ordinary human being who can make the big difference. Participating in Government is a responsibility that we all share. When we see something happening around us that is unfair and unjust we can speak up, stand and be counted.

We can also disobey an unfair law.. openly. if the salt law was seen as unfair Gandhi was determined to break the law. This is very different form jumping a light for going dasher, or avoiding taxes - these are for personal benefit. Disobedience of a law that is unfair is a way of participation in a democratic process, challenging the Government by drawing empathy and reconsideration from the very people who are in the Government.

30 Nov 2009

Class X exams - Schooling in India - an experience or a certificate

Class X exams - Schooling in India - an experience or a certificate

"Specificity destorys Harmony" said a Chinese Sage. 

This piece considers the much talked of attempt to do away with "pass - fail" in CBSE schools. Probably nowhere is this truer than in our assessments of each other. Fallible as we are, our assessments of each other are incomplete, poor and inadequate. We are prone to see what we wish to see and tie these perceptions to facts whcih we notice. 

Probably no where is Specificity destrutive of Harmony than in the handing down of marks to young citizens called students in school - yes handing down, make no mistake, from lofty heights by human beings who are as fallible as you and I. A small story illustrates this point extremely well.

A hard working villager found a new master. He was a qucik worker and did all jobs with astonishing speed. He could chop wood, dig pits for planting trees reapir the fencing, carry huge sacks and stack them. The master was pleased at having found such a worker. One day a few sacks of potatoes from the field were given to the worker. He was instructed to sort them, separating the good ones from the bad. He was sure that this would be an easy job for his capable worker. In the evening he found the worker still just halfway through the sack. On seeing the landowner he folded his hands and said, "Sir, give me as much manual work as you wish to. I will be happy to do it. But please do not give me this job of deciding which potato is good and which bad. This work has been very stressful for me. Any work but this!" 

If it is so difficult to see the inside of a potato, how much more difficult to see inside a human being!                

Schools offer experience and opportunities. We need to know what this endeavour means. We try to know what students have learnt to find out if the teaching has been effective. And if it has not, then we fail children in school! If the child's circumstances are such that he or she cannot study well at home, then we fail the child! We regiment the children with uniforms and are sure that this will make them feel better and do better! How are we sure that this is the right thing to do? We are sure because this what we were handed down and this is what we accept. 

Our memories are short and dont go before 3 generations, certainly not 150 years. It is almost as if that time did not exist. We dont remember for a moment that early schools in all parts of the world did not have pass or fail. People learnt and then went on to use whatever they had learnt in their lives. The church schools, the pathashaalas, the madarassas and gurukulas were all like this. And every studio and artisan's workshop. And suddenly, the magic hand of industrial revolution, drove most of these into oblivion to be replaced by the 'graded, school, the 'uniformed' school, the 'pass - fail" school, the "specific" school - the 'factory' school.

The age wise segregated classroom is a creation of very poor imagination. Nowhere in the world do we find living things of the same age clustered together naturally, except for the brief moments - like when turtle hatchlings head for the ocean. Human society has managed this accomplishment - to convince all thinking human beings that this is the ONE right way to educate children. We do this knowing that never again, after school, will people of the same age cluster, except at brief reunions. We have to accept that the school, as we know it, is a flawed design, however nostalgic we feel. In fact the present structure survives on nostagia and has defied any attempt at reordering.

Learning is a magical thing, a potent and mysterious happening. Blaming, particularly the young, punishing them for not learning what we wish to teach them is such a limited action. Saying "pass or fail" is bad enough. Tearing a student away from the social fabric of the classroom is an even worse act of aggression. If we accept the mystery that is man, the magic that is learning and that the future is something we dont know, we must reconsider the choices we have made as a nation, as a diverse group of 1 billion, as humanity.

Life is an examination, a test of one's understanding, skill and inner fibre. Each situation we  challenges us with an inner conversation.  We each have a watchful eye, our own eye, observing the responses we bring forth. Our watchful eye knows where we made an error of judgement, where we were not alert and where we were full of fear ... Each situation educates us. This was called swadhayaya. 

The school and its processes subsumes swadhayaya, the teaching of the self by the self, and hands this authority outside. The authority outside can instruct, can create oportunity and design experiences but cannot ensure learning. The authority outside can punish and castigate but not ensure a well learnt lesson.

It is wih this background we must consider the much talked of attempt to do away with "pass - fail" in CBSE schools. Society and human beings move in strange ways. One of the best ways to move and change is to recognize that a system is not working because it does not pass the standards we wish to see. Today in search for social and institutional mechanisms that do justice to all, not most or majority, we need to discontinue some handed down practices or to modify them. Further, the restraining of one approach creates room for other approaches to express themselves. 

If the exam as a fearful threshold sheds its terrifying mask, then students may breathe easy. On the other hand they may also feel a bit disoriented, as will their parents. This uncertainty, or break in procedure, is sure to raise anxieties about college admissions and higher education, and also foster conversations about meaning and purpose of school education. 

School Education has begun the slow and definite redefinition towards 'schooling an experience', for each student by right, containing within it a choiceless dignity at entry and exit and during schooling, for each and every student. It is important that the process of schooling empowers and does not disempower, invalidate a single student. The present conversation about school exams is underscoring the fact that a large number of children experience disempowerment through schooling, particularly through examination assessment.

Is this the only solution? Are there not ways of improving our examinations? Do we have to abandon them altogether? Will we be able to distinguish between students who are capable and those who do not? The answer to these questions, at the moment seems to be -- 

"There are surely better ways of conducting an examination. However, for a nation such as ours with 1 billion people and the diversity that is seen in only one other nation, with a bursting population of youth, the last thing we can afford is rampant in validation of our youth. It is important to leave each student with his or her dignity intact. Since we have entered the zone of lifelong learning, the value of the 10 standard examination, in fact all examinations, has definitely diminished. The daily life of any worker will test what learning the worker has, more important, how open is the worker to new learning."

Looking back on this situation from 10 years hence, I'm sure we will think it's commendable that our nation could even conceive of such a far-reaching step. It is also true that no real change happens without some discomfort and realignment in our thinking.


Aug 2009

Game of life India Edition 2009

Aug 21, 2009

decisions have a short shelf life...
only till the next review.

prizes have a small life...
overshadowed by the next winner,
there is always one

process has long shelf life...
sustained by sense of fairness,
distilled wisdom and egality...

Jul 30, 2009

Leadership

Is leadership to lead?
Does it mean leading another person or a group of people? Does leadership involve follower-ship?
One person leads as he / she has the best ideas. The rest are less than...

And since there are few original ideas, are we all followers?

Leadership used to mean leading people, movements, organizations... does it still mean the same?

Jun 21, 2009

We were given infinity and eternity...

A friend wrote..."When the senior managers I was working with hit Delhi airport many of them said, " Bloody civilization" ! A sad commentry on what we have made of our society."

We were given infinity and eternity
we reduced it to centimetres and seconds
Most of us scrambled to get our piece of action
before we passed on
Some of us fretted about what we leave behind
for our children and grandchildren
A few of us sought oases to taste the earth
as she was made
Fewer still mulled
... the creation of oases...